Executive Summary

---

Company Profile Summary

The company designs and delivers secure, fully tailored software and mobile applications that optimize manufacturing processes, boost productivity, and drive measurable growth through a client-centered, UX/UI-first approach. Backed by continuous technology monitoring and a hybrid delivery model (online and on-site), the firm is structured to ship MVPs within 8–12 weeks and scale engagements efficiently.

It is privately owned by its founders and operates in the United States with a focus on SME manufacturers. Viability rests on a large, fast-growing market, clear specialization (secure integrations across ERP/MES/PLM and shop-floor systems), and a boutique operating model aligned to SME budgets. A key collaborator, Marketing Director Anthony Paillette, brings strong go-to-market execution to accelerate pipeline development and conversion.

Investors and lenders gain exposure to a fragmented, expanding market with defensible differentiation and near-term revenue potential. The 3–5 year objective is to complete 25–35 projects annually at an average $180k–$220k, reaching approximately $5–6M in annual revenue while maintaining rigorous delivery quality and client outcomes.

Market Study Summary

The core market sits at the intersection of custom software development and manufacturing digital transformation. The global custom software market is estimated at $53.0B in 2025 and projected to reach ~$334.5B by 2034 (~22.7% CAGR), with North America holding ~34% share. The U.S. remains the largest digital transformation market (> $1T in 2025), and manufacturing (discrete + process) accounts for roughly 30% of worldwide DX spend—supporting robust demand in manufacturing use cases. The U.S. IoT-in-manufacturing market alone is ~ $22.9B in 2025.

A conservative SAM for U.S. manufacturing-focused custom software is ~ $5.4B. The market is highly fragmented (top 10 players ~18.3% combined share; largest ~2.8%), creating room for specialized entrants. Risk and adoption catalysts are strong: U.S. data breaches average ~$9.36M per incident, elevating “secure-by-design” as a buying criterion; firms in the top quartile of McKinsey’s Design Index outperform with 32% higher revenue growth and 56% higher TSR—validating a UX-first approach.

Key competitors/alternatives include West Monroe (consulting/operations integration), Tulip Interfaces (no‑code frontline platform), and EPAM Systems (global custom engineering). Differentiation is anchored in end-to-end customization, operator‑centric UX/UI, and security‑hardened integrations.

Marketing Strategy Summary

Target customers are U.S. SME manufacturers (NAICS 31–33), especially mid-sized plants (50–999 employees) with pressing needs in automation, quality, traceability, and secure integrations. Priority geographies include the Midwest/Great Lakes (MI, OH, IL), Southeast (NC, SC, GA), Texas, and California.

Go-to-market emphasizes use‑case‑led value:

• 1) changeover time reduction
• 2) quality/first-time-right
• 3) production tracking/OEE

Key messages:

• operator‑centric UX accelerates adoption and time‑to‑value
• secure integration reduces breach exposure
• tailored builds outperform one‑size platforms in complex environments

Channels:

• account-based marketing to targeted clusters
• partnerships with ERP/MES vendors and system integrators
• industry associations
• founder‑led selling
• thought leadership (UX/security in manufacturing), webinars, and case‑style proofs of value

Offers:

• fixed‑scope discovery
• 8–12 week MVPs
• phased rollouts that de‑risk spend

Commercial targets: Year 1–2 secure 8–12 pilot/MVP engagements; by Year 4–5, 25–35 projects annually at $180k–$220k average, yielding ~$5–6M revenue. Delivery KPIs tied to client outcomes include +5–15 OEE points, −10–20% scrap, and −30–60% changeover time, with >80% operator adoption within 30–60 days post‑launch.

Market Study

---

1) Market size, growth, and key segments (United States focus)

• Core market definition: Bespoke software and mobile applications with strong UX/UI for manufacturers seeking process automation, secure systems integration, and productivity gains. This sits at the intersection of custom software development services and manufacturing digital transformation.
• Market size and growth:
  • Global custom software development is estimated at $53.0B in 2025 and projected to reach ~$334.5B by 2034 (≈22.7% CAGR). North America holds the largest regional share (~34%).
  • Independent estimates show a 2024 base of ~$43.2B with ~22.6% CAGR to 2030, reinforcing rapid growth and North America’s leadership.
  • U.S. manufacturers’ digitization drivers are strong: the U.S. IoT-in-manufacturing market is estimated at ~$22.9B in 2025, propelled by predictive maintenance, supply-chain visibility, and energy efficiency.
  • Digital transformation spending context: IDC indicates the U.S. remains the largest DX market and surpasses $1T in 2025; discrete and process manufacturing collectively account for nearly 30% of worldwide DX spend—validating robust demand within manufacturing.
• Targetable customer base:
  • Small firms dominate U.S. manufacturing: small manufacturers represent ~98% of manufacturing firms; 603,348 small manufacturing businesses (2021) employing ~4.8M, with 234,931 employer firms. While dated one year, this is the latest official SBA cut by industry.
  • Total manufacturing businesses across the U.S. were ~608,000 in 2025 (IBISWorld), indicating a large prospect universe for SME-focused solutions.
• Risk and UX adoption catalysts:
  • Average global cost of a data breach reached ~$4.88M in 2024; the U.S. remains the highest-cost market at ~$9.36M, sharpening demand for secure-by-design solutions.
  • Design-led products materially improve adoption and outcomes: companies in the top quartile of McKinsey’s Design Index achieved 32% higher revenue growth and 56% higher total shareholder returns over five years, supporting a UX-first approach in industrial apps.
• Key segments within manufacturing (demand patterns):
  • Discrete manufacturing (automotive, aerospace, industrial equipment): strong MES/MOM, quality, and traceability needs.
  • Process manufacturing (food & beverage, chemicals, pharma): batch control, compliance, and changeover optimization.
  • Cross-cutting needs: mobile-first frontline apps, secure integrations (ERP/MES/PLM), analytics and AI for OEE, downtime, scrap, and workforce productivity.

2) TAM, SAM, SOM (with methods and assumptions)

• TAM (Total Addressable Market): Global custom software development services that match the firm’s offer (bespoke apps, UX/UI, secure integrations) = ~$53.0B in 2025, growing ~22–23% CAGR.
• SAM (Serviceable Addressable Market): Narrowing TAM to the United States and to manufacturing use cases.
  • Method: Start with North America’s ~34% share of the global custom software market ≈ $18.0B (2025). Apply manufacturing weighting as a proxy using IDC’s finding that manufacturing is ~30% of DX spending; we conservatively use 30% as a proxy for custom-services demand in manufacturing. SAM ≈ $18.0B × 30% ≈ $5.4B (U.S. manufacturing-focused custom software). This is an inference using DX shares as a conservative proxy for custom development mix.
• SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market, 3–5 years):
  • The market is highly fragmented: the top 10 competitors hold only ~18.3% share globally; the largest player has ~2.8%. That fragmentation makes room for specialized entrants.
  • Bottom-up capture estimate for a specialized U.S. player focused on SME manufacturers:
    • Average project budget benchmarks: median custom project cost ≈ $132k; U.S. providers commonly quote $100–$149/hour; enterprise-grade industrial projects often run $150k–$500k when integrations and security are in scope.
    • If, by Year 3–5, the firm completes 25–35 projects annually at an average $180k–$220k (new builds + integration + UX + hardening), annual revenue potential ≈ $4.5M–$7.7M. Against a ~$5.4B SAM, that equates to ≈0.08%–0.14% share. A practical SOM target: ~$5–6M annualized revenue (~0.09%–0.11% of SAM) by Year 4–5, given pre-launch status, a boutique delivery model, and SME focus.

3) Customer profile (demographic, geographic, behavioral)

• Demographic:
  • U.S. SME manufacturers (NAICS 31–33), especially mid-sized (50–999 employees) with pressing automation, quality, and integration needs. Small firms are ~98% of manufacturing entities, indicating decision-maker accessibility but also resource constraints.
• Geographic:
  • Priority clusters: Midwest and Great Lakes (MI, OH, IL), Southeast (NC, SC, GA), Texas, and California—dense manufacturing footprints and supply-chain hubs. (IBISWorld confirms the overall business count trend; state-level targeting can be refined in go-to-market.)
• Behavioral:
  • High sensitivity to security and compliance costs given breach exposure; strong appetite for use-case-led ROI (OEE, scrap, changeover time, first-time-right).
  • Preference for solutions that deliver visible operator adoption and measurable outcomes—where superior UX/UI materially shortens time-to-value.

4) Emerging trends and their impact (opportunities)

• GenAI and applied AI in manufacturing software: Scaling remains hard—only ~26% of “advanced/disruptor” firms have delivered AI use cases to market—opening services opportunities to operationalize AI on the plant floor (quality, predictive maintenance, scheduling).
• IIoT/MOM modernization: U.S. IoT-in-manufacturing is a ~$23B opportunity in 2025; custom connectors, UX-first operator apps, and secure cloud-edge integration are high-demand layers where bespoke work is necessary.
• Secure-by-design integrations: With U.S. breach averages around ~$9.36M/event, SMEs increasingly require hardening of integrations (ERP/MES/PLM/SCADA) and identity, making “secure integration” a buying criterion, not a nice-to-have.
• Field/Frontline mobility: Field service and frontline operations software continue to grow ~11–13% CAGR globally, reflecting appetite for mobile-first workflows that cut cycle times and raise first-time-fix rates—relevant for maintenance, quality, and production support apps.

5) Competitive landscape (direct competitors in the U.S. market)

Given the firm’s positioning (bespoke software with strong UX/UI for manufacturing SMEs), three direct competitors/alternatives are:

A. West Monroe (consulting and engineering services)

• Specialization/positioning: U.S.-based consultancy blending operations, data/analytics, and technology; strong work in operations-intensive sectors (food, CPG, industrials). Targets mid-market to large clients; increasingly relevant to upper-SME manufacturers undergoing plant digitalization.
• Products/services: Operations transformation, industrial IoT data foundations, OEE programs, analytics platforms, plant systems integration, and UX-driven tooling for frontline teams.
• Market share: In a fragmented custom-dev/services market where the top-10 hold ~18.3% combined and the largest player ~2.8%, West Monroe’s share is small (<1% globally) but strong regionally by vertical reputation. (Fragmentation benchmark.)

B. Tulip Interfaces (no-code manufacturing app platform; “build vs. buy” alternative)

• Specialization/positioning: Frontline operations platform (composable, no-code) used to build manufacturing apps quickly—competes as a faster, productized alternative to custom builds for shop-floor digitization.
• Products/services: No-code app builder, composable MES, quality, production tracking, connected work instructions; growing library of templates and connectors; professional services and partner network for deployment.
• Market share: As a product platform in a fragmented market, Tulip’s individual share is not publicly disclosed; in the custom-dev context it functions as a frequent substitute for bespoke builds in targeted use cases (implying measurable displacement, not conventional “share of custom services”).

C. EPAM Systems (global product engineering and custom dev)

• Specialization/positioning: Large global engineering firm with deep custom software capabilities across industries, including manufacturing; typically engages larger clients but increasingly offers modular teams and accelerators.
• Products/services: End-to-end product engineering, cloud modernization, data/AI enablement, platform integration, and UX. BlueOptima reported 76.5% of EPAM’s lead developers exceed global productivity/quality benchmarks—relevant when evaluating delivery scale and quality.
• Market share: Within custom development, even the largest companies retain low single-digit global shares; per TBRC, the #1 player holds ~2.8%—illustrating that EPAM’s practical share in U.S. manufacturing custom-dev is well under 1%. (Fragmentation benchmark.)

6) Competitor strengths and weaknesses (with quantified examples)

A. West Monroe

Strengths

• Operations outcomes clarity: documented 37% increase in weekly production and ROI within 16 weeks for a manufacturer—proves ability to translate data and tech into throughput quickly.
• Measurable multi-metric impact: another client saw $2.7M/month revenue run-rate lift, 55-point inventory accuracy improvement, and +25 percentage points OEE for key assets in ~13–26 weeks—evidence of speed plus depth in plant improvements.

Weaknesses

• Cost-to-SME fit: boutique SME manufacturers may find Tier-1 consulting day rates and program overhead 15–30% higher than smaller specialist studios—often pushing projects toward phased or narrower scopes; this is a common mid-market complaint relative to large consultancies (inferred from market pricing norms).
• Productization trade-offs: methodology-led programs can bias toward sizable change portfolios; SMEs seeking targeted UX-heavy apps may perceive longer discovery and governance cycles before shipping MVPs (risk to time-to-value compared with a leaner custom dev shop).

B. Tulip Interfaces

Strengths

• Rapid, quantifiable results: case examples show a 78% reduction in line changeover time (14 days to 3), 20% scrap reduction, and ~18% productivity gains when digitizing workflows; some clients report 50–60% lower inspection/rework time. A commissioned Forrester TEI reported a modeled 448% ROI over three years.
• Composable templates and connectors: accelerators for production tracking, OEE, and quality enable fast launches and iterative expansion—well suited to SMEs seeking quick wins.

Weaknesses

• Fit limits for highly specialized logic: very complex, bespoke logic or unusual integrations can exceed no-code constraints, forcing custom extensions or parallel bespoke builds, raising total cost/complexity.
• Platform lock-in and TCO: while time-to-value is strong, subscription plus scaling usage and advanced validation features can push TCO above a lean custom solution over 3–5 years in narrowly scoped use cases (observed in platform economics; specific customer TCO varies case-by-case).

C. EPAM Systems

Strengths

• Scale and depth: broad skill coverage (cloud, data/AI, platform engineering), with independent analysis noting >76% of lead developers exceeding productivity and quality benchmarks—relevant for multi-stream or long-lived programs.
• Thought leadership in AI adoption: 7,300+ decision-makers surveyed indicated only 26% of “advanced/disruptor” firms had market-ready AI use cases—EPAM positions to close this strategy-to-deployment gap, which many manufacturers now face.

Weaknesses

• Enterprise orientation: typical engagement sizes and governance can exceed SME constraints (budgets, lead times), with common project medians in the six-figure-plus range—less flexible vs. smaller, UX-led boutiques (aligned with U.S. cost benchmarks).
• Onboarding complexity: distributed delivery models and enterprise-grade processes can lengthen onboarding and decision cycles for SMEs seeking sub-12-week MVPs (a frequent friction point for mid-market buyers when comparing to nimble studios).

7) Summary of competitive advantages for the firm (benefits to the client)

• End-to-end customization with UX/UI at the core: Design-led, operator-centric interfaces accelerate adoption and sustained use, aligning with evidence that top-quartile design performers materially outperform on growth; SMEs see faster ramp-up and less training cost.
• Secure integration as a default: Engineering for identity, data protection, and least-privilege patterns across ERP/MES/PLM and shop-floor data flows reduces breach exposure in the highest-cost market (U.S. average breach ~$9.36M).
• Manufacturing focus with measurable outcomes: Targeting OEE, throughput, scrap, and changeover-time KPIs to deliver time-bound gains comparable to market exemplars—e.g., double-digit capacity or cycle-time improvements—through fit-for-purpose solutions rather than one-size platforms.
• Hybrid delivery (online + on-site) tuned to SMEs: Combines rapid discovery/prototyping online with selective in-person plant walks and rollouts, keeping budgets tight and cycle times short versus large-consultancy programs (benchmarked median project costs emphasize the value of lean teams).

Appendix: data notes and assumptions

• Market size triangulation: We cite two independent market analyses for custom software services (Grand View Research; Precedence) to show consistent trajectory and scale; we anchor 2025 TAM on Precedence and use IDC for manufacturing weighting in SAM.
• SAM methodology: Because public sources rarely break custom software revenue by vertical and country with SME granularity, we use IDC’s ~30% manufacturing share of DX spending as a conservative proxy for the manufacturing slice of U.S. custom dev. This is an explicit inference; it is directionally consistent with observed spend and use cases in manufacturing.
• Competitive shares: The custom dev/services market is fragmented; TBRC indicates the top-10 hold ~18.3% and the #1 player ~2.8%, implying sub-1% shares for most firms—context for realistic SOM sizing.
• Project cost benchmarks: Clutch’s 2025 pricing data (median ~$132k; U.S. $100–$149/hr) underpins bottom-up SOM calculations and supports a lean, SME-compatible delivery model.

References (selected)

• Custom software development market size and North America share.
• U.S. IoT in manufacturing market size.
• IDC digital transformation spending by industry/region.
• SBA Office of Advocacy: manufacturing small-business statistics.
• IBISWorld: total number of U.S. manufacturing businesses.
• IBM Cost of a Data Breach (global, U.S.) and press analysis.
• McKinsey “Business Value of Design.”
• Fragmentation of custom software market (TBRC).
• West Monroe manufacturing case results.
• Tulip case studies and TEI findings.
• EPAM productivity benchmark and AI adoption study.
• Clutch 2025 software development pricing.

Expected client impact

For SME manufacturers, a UX-first, security-hardened, and fully tailored solution is well aligned with current risk, adoption, and ROI pressures in the U.S. landscape. With disciplined focus on 2–3 high-value use cases per plant (e.g., changeover, quality, production tracking), the firm can credibly target a ~$5–6M SOM within 3–5 years while building a defensible reputation in a large, fast-growing, and fragmented market.

Situation analysis

---

1) Industry overview

Barriers to entry

• Talent intensity and delivery economics
  • Facts: U.S. software development rates commonly range from $100–$149/hour and median custom-project budgets are around $132k, with industrial-grade builds often reaching $150k–$500k when security and integrations are in scope. This creates high upfront working-capital needs for a new entrant.
  • Examples: A plant-floor quality app with ERP/MES integration and hardened identity typically requires senior engineering, DevOps, and security resources; custom connectors to SAP or Oracle ERP plus MES/SCADA (e.g., Rockwell, Siemens) and shop-floor gateways push costs and skills demands above generic web/mobile builds.
  • How the company overcomes: A lean, hybrid delivery model (online discovery + targeted on-site work) keeps non-billable overhead low while focusing on a narrow set of high-ROI use cases to reach positive cash flow quickly.
• Security, compliance, and integration complexity
  • Facts: The average data breach cost in the U.S. is ≈$9.36M and remains the highest globally—raising the bar for secure-by-design engineering. Discrete and process manufacturing have strict traceability and batch-control requirements; manufacturing represents nearly 30% of global digital transformation spend, underscoring depth and breadth of systems to integrate.
  • Examples: Process manufacturers (food, chemicals, pharma) often require audit trails and electronic signatures; discrete manufacturers (automotive, aerospace) need tight MES/MOM quality and traceability. Integrating ERP/MES/PLM with OT systems demands identity hardening, least-privilege patterns, and robust data pipelines.
  • How the company overcomes: Secure integration is positioned as default (identity, data protection, least privilege). The delivery approach emphasizes hardened connectors and operator-centric UX to reduce misuse and training risks.
• Go-to-market access to manufacturing SMEs
  • Facts: Small manufacturers represent ~98% of U.S. manufacturing firms; ~608,000 manufacturing businesses in 2025 indicate a vast but fragmented buyer base with varied budgets and decision cycles.
  • Examples: Selling a production-tracking app to a 150-employee plant in Ohio differs greatly from deploying changeover optimization across a multi-plant enterprise in Texas. Consistent messaging on ROI (e.g., OEE, scrap, changeover time) is required for efficient pipeline conversion.
  • How the company overcomes: A focused ICP (SME manufacturers) and outcome-led offers (e.g., 12-week MVPs for production tracking, digital quality, or changeovers) create clear entry points.

Factors of differentiation

• Design-led, operator-centric UX/UI
  • Facts: Companies in the top quartile of McKinsey’s Design Index achieved 32% higher revenue growth and 56% higher TSR over five years—evidence that UX materially influences adoption and outcomes.
  • Examples: Mobile-first work-instructions and digital quality checks that operators prefer reduce time-to-train and errors; clear dashboards tied to OEE and downtime accelerate supervisor decision-making.
  • How the company differentiates: UX/UI is a core mission; interfaces are tailored to plant roles and workflows to shorten time-to-value and sustain usage.
• Secure-by-design systems integration
  • Facts: With U.S. breach costs ≈$9.36M and IoT-in-manufacturing at ≈$22.9B in 2025, demand is surging for hardened ERP/MES/PLM integrations and secure cloud–edge architectures.
  • Examples: Identity-aware connectors across SAP/Oracle ERP, MES/MOM, and SCADA, enforcing least privilege and immutable logs; encrypted data pipelines from machines to analytics for OEE and scrap analysis.
  • How the company differentiates: Security and reliability are engineered from the start (identity, RBAC, data protection), not bolted on—reducing operational risk and compliance exposure.
• Hybrid delivery tuned to SMEs
  • Facts: Custom software market fragmentation (top 10 players at ~18.3%, largest at ~2.8%) makes boutique specialization a viable path; U.S. pricing benchmarks reinforce the value of lean teams.
  • Examples: Remote discovery and prototyping to compress cycles; targeted on-site plant walks to refine user stories and de-risk rollout.
  • How the company differentiates: A boutique, high-touch method combines speed with specificity to the plant environment.

Opportunities and threats

• Opportunities
  • Facts: U.S. serviceable addressable market for manufacturing-focused custom software is ≈$5.4B; U.S. is the largest DX market (surpassing $1T in 2025); IIoT-in-manufacturing ≈$22.9B in 2025; field/frontline software is growing ~11–13% CAGR globally.
  • Examples: High-impact use cases include production tracking, digital quality, predictive maintenance, changeover optimization, and secure data foundations for OEE and scrap reduction.
  • Implication: A credible 3–5 year SOM of ~$5–6M annualized revenue (≈0.09–0.11% SAM) is attainable by executing 25–35 SME projects annually at $180–220k average value.
• Threats
  • Facts: Platforms like Tulip show rapid time-to-value (Forrester TEI modeled 448% ROI) and can displace bespoke builds for standard workflows; large consultancies (e.g., West Monroe) publicize outcome-driven case studies (+37% capacity, multi-million $ monthly gains) that influence buyer expectations.
  • Examples: No-code platforms may capably cover work instructions and basic production tracking; Tier-1 firms can win complex, multi-stream programs.
  • Implication: The company must win where bespoke logic, secure integrations, and UX depth matter most—and price/phasing must stay SME-compatible.

2) Key market trends

Trend 1: Secure-by-design integrations

• Context and importance: Breach costs in the U.S. average ≈$9.36M; manufacturers are integrating ERP/MES/PLM with OT and cloud, expanding the attack surface.
• Impact on the market: Security shifts from a non-functional requirement to a core buying criterion; identity, least privilege, encryption, and auditability are now table stakes.
• Impact on the company: Security-hardened connectors and data flows are embedded by default, reinforcing trust and reducing risk for SME buyers with limited internal security teams.

Trend 2: Design-led industrial UX

• Context and importance: McKinsey links strong design to 32% higher revenue growth and 56% higher TSR; frontline adoption and operator experience determine sustained ROI.
• Impact on the market: Solutions that operators favor outperform in time-to-value and stickiness; training and change-management costs fall when UX is intuitive.
• Impact on the company: A UX-first mission becomes a strategic lever to accelerate adoption in production, quality, and maintenance apps—differentiating against generic toolsets or process-heavy consultancies.

Trend 3: IIoT/MOM modernization and cloud–edge architectures

• Context and importance: U.S. IoT-in-manufacturing ≈$22.9B in 2025; plants need composable, interoperable layers rather than monolithic systems.
• Impact on the market: Demand rises for custom connectors, event streaming, edge analytics, and secure device management; integration to ERP/MES/PLM becomes continuous, not one-off.
• Impact on the company: Tailored integration and modernization services—anchored in secure edge-to-cloud patterns—fit the firm’s custom-build strengths and SME budget realities.

Trend 4: Applied AI and GenAI on the plant floor

• Context and importance: Only ~26% of “advanced/disruptor” firms report market-ready AI use cases—execution gaps persist in manufacturing.
• Impact on the market: Buyers seek partners who move from pilots to production (quality, predictive maintenance, scheduling) with measurable KPIs (e.g., first-time-right, downtime).
• Impact on the company: The firm can package AI as add-ons to core apps (defect detection, anomaly alerts, schedule optimization), prioritizing explainability and user-centric UX to drive adoption.

3) SWOT (FFOM)

Strengths

• End-to-end customization focused on manufacturing SMEs, aligning with a U.S. SAM ≈$5.4B and a prospect base of ~608,000 manufacturing businesses.
• UX/UI excellence as a core mission, supported by market evidence that design-led products drive 32% higher revenue growth and 56% higher TSR—translating into faster operator adoption and lower training costs.
• Security-by-design engineering across ERP/MES/PLM and shop-floor integrations, directly addressing U.S. breach costs (~$9.36M average) and SME risk exposure.
• Hybrid delivery (online + on-site) that compresses discovery and rollout cycles versus large consultancies, consistent with U.S. pricing benchmarks and SME budget constraints.
• Client-centered methodology and continuous technology monitoring that keep solutions aligned to evolving plant needs and tech stacks.
• Marketing leadership via an experienced Marketing Director (Anthony Paillette), supporting precise ICP targeting and outcome-led positioning.

Weaknesses

• Pre-launch status limits references and social proof, potentially elongating early sales cycles with risk-averse manufacturers.
• Dependence on highly qualified talent in a competitive market can constrain capacity, increase delivery risk, and raise cost-to-serve if not mitigated by disciplined staffing and partnerships.
• Boutique scale may limit eligibility for multi-stream, multi-plant programs that favor larger consultancies or global integrators.
• Potential perception gap versus product platforms (e.g., no-code) on time-to-first-value without strong accelerators, templates, or case evidence.

Opportunities

• Strong market growth: global custom development projected to reach ~$334.5B by 2034 (~22–23% CAGR), with North America ≈34% share; U.S. remains the largest DX market (> $1T in 2025).
• Manufacturing digitization tailwinds: IIoT-in-manufacturing ≈$22.9B in 2025; discrete and process manufacturing together account for nearly 30% of global DX spend—validating sustained demand for custom integrations and mobile frontline apps.
• UX-led outcomes: Demonstrated market impact of design maturity supports a differentiated, operator-centric approach for OEE, downtime, scrap, and changeover KPIs.
• Fragmented competitive field: With the top-10 holding ~18.3% share and the #1 at ~2.8%, a specialized SME-focused entrant can win targeted use cases and build a defensible reputation.
• Practical SOM: Delivering 25–35 projects annually at $180–220k supports ~$5–6M annualized revenue by years 4–5 (≈0.09–0.11% of SAM), compounding through add-on modules and integration phases.

Threats

• Platform substitution: No-code/low-code platforms (e.g., Tulip) can satisfy standard workflows quickly, with publicized ROI (e.g., modeled 448% TEI) that may sway buyers away from bespoke builds.
• Large-consultancy signaling: Outcome-heavy case studies (+37% capacity, multi-million monthly gains) set high expectations for speed and impact, potentially raising the proof burden for a new entrant.
• Talent market tightness: Competition for senior engineers, security specialists, and industrial integrators can delay hiring and escalate costs, particularly for on-site phases.
• Security and compliance risk: Rising breach costs and complex integration environments increase liability; any lapse can damage credibility disproportionately for a young firm.
• Macro uncertainty and budget scrutiny: SME buyers may defer non-essential programs, favoring modular, rapid-payback initiatives and squeezing scope or pricing.

Overall positioning

The company competes at the intersection of custom software and manufacturing digital transformation, with differentiation anchored in operator-centric UX, secure-by-design integrations, and SME-tuned delivery. The addressable U.S. opportunity (~$5.4B SAM) and clear use cases (production tracking, digital quality, changeovers, OEE analytics) support a practical $5–6M SOM in 3–5 years, provided the firm systematically builds references, templates/accelerators, and a repeatable hybrid delivery playbook.

Marketing Strategy

---

Commercial Objectives

Introduction: The company’s vision is to become the trusted, design-led partner for U.S. SME manufacturers seeking secure, tailored software to accelerate digital transformation. Objectives are phased to de-risk market entry (short term), build repeatable growth engines (mid term), and scale share within a large, fragmented market (long term). Clear milestones and KPIs ensure resources are allocated to the highest-ROI use cases while strengthening competitiveness against larger consultancies and “build-vs-buy” platforms.

Short-term objectives (0–12 months)

1. Validate product–market fit and revenue ramp: win 8–12 paid projects with SME manufacturers in priority clusters (Midwest, Southeast, Texas, California) at an average $120k–$180k. Target $1.2–$1.8M revenue, 25–30% win rate, MVP lead time ≤10–12 weeks, and ≥75% operator adoption within 30 days. Measure via booked revenue, cycle time to MVP, adoption analytics, and NPS ≥50.

2. Build a qualified pipeline and brand presence: create a 200-account ABM list; generate 120 SQLs with ≥30% SQL-to-win ratio and 15% partner-sourced pipeline. Launch three demo apps (changeover, quality/traceability, production tracking) and two security integration briefs. Measure MQL→SQL conversion ≥25%, website conversion ≥2.0%, and CAC payback ≤12 months.

3. Delivery and security excellence: deliver 100% of projects with baseline KPIs (OEE, scrap, changeover). Achieve median 10–15% cycle-time reduction by week 12, 0 critical security findings at go-live, and integration SLA ≥99.5%. Measure via pre/post KPI deltas, security scans, and SLA dashboards.

Mid-term objectives (12–36 months)

1. Scale bookings with repeatable offers: complete 20–26 projects/year at $160k–$200k average, reaching $3.2–$5.2M annual revenue and 40–50% gross margin. Packages (“Changeover Optimization,” “Quality & Traceability,” “Production Tracking”) to represent ≥40% of bookings. Measure with bookings mix, margin, and package attach rates.

2. Deepen manufacturing penetration: acquire 50 logos across discrete and process manufacturing; achieve 30% partner-sourced pipeline via ERP/MES/PLM/IIoT partnerships and regional SIs. Measure via net-new logos, partner-originated opportunities, and multi-plant expansions ≥25% of wins.

3. Operationalize outcomes at scale: standardize delivery playbooks to consistently deliver +8–12 OEE points or ≥20% scrap reduction in 90 days on ≥80% of projects. Maintain NPS ≥55 and 85% operator adoption within 30 days. Measure via KPI dashboards, adoption telemetry, and CSAT ≥4.5/5.

Long-term objectives (36–60 months)

1. Achieve pragmatic share of SAM: reach $5–6M annual revenue (≈0.09–0.11% of an estimated $5.4B U.S. manufacturing SAM), with 25–35 projects/year at $180k–$220k and ≥20% revenue from managed enhancements/support. Measure via revenue mix and retention.

2. Build ecosystem credibility: secure five strategic partnerships (ERP/MES/PLM/IIoT, cybersecurity), publish 12 quantified case studies, and earn three industry recognitions. Measure via partner pipeline contribution ≥35% and award/certification milestones.

3. Scale delivery capacity while protecting quality: codify a secure-by-design integration framework and maintain employee retention ≥85% for key roles. Sustain CSAT ≥4.6/5 and defect escape rate ≤1% in production. Measure via QA, security audits, and talent metrics.

Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning

General introduction: Precise segmentation, targeting, and positioning ensure resources concentrate on the highest-value use cases and buyers. This approach sharpens message–market fit, shortens sales cycles, and differentiates against both large consultancies and no-code platforms by aligning offers to the realities of plant operations and security risk.

Segmentation

Introduction: Segmentation divides a broad, fast-growing market into actionable groups so offers, pricing, and messages reflect distinct needs and constraints. For U.S. manufacturing, relevant differences include production mode (discrete vs. process), regulatory exposure, integration complexity, and budget governance.

Segment 1: Discrete Manufacturing SMEs (Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial Equipment)

• Needs:
  • MES/MOM and ERP integration for real-time production visibility
  • Quality and traceability, especially for regulated tiers
  • Downtime reduction, OEE uplift, and faster changeovers
• Demographics:
  • 50–500 employees; multi-line plants; tier-2/3 suppliers common
  • Regions: Midwest/Great Lakes, Southeast, Texas, California
• Buying behaviors:
  • ROI- and time-to-value-driven pilots (≤12 weeks)
  • Influencers: COO, Plant Manager, Director of Operations, IT/OT lead
  • Preference for secure integrations and minimal operator retraining

Segment 2: Process Manufacturing SMEs (Food & Beverage, Chemicals, Pharma)

• Needs:
  • Batch control, electronic records, and compliance (e.g., FDA/FSMA)
  • Quality management and first-time-right improvements
  • Secure integration with ERP/LIMS/SCADA, audit-ready data
• Demographics:
  • 100–999 employees; multi-plant operations possible
  • Regions: Southeast, Texas, California, Midwest
• Buying behaviors:
  • Vendor shortlist via compliance track record and references
  • Validation of security posture; preference for templated accelerators
  • Strong interest in mobile workflows for QA/sanitation/maintenance

Segment 3: Tier-2/3 Suppliers and Contract Manufacturers (Cross-Industry)

• Needs:
  • Rapid digitization for customer audits and EDI/PLM alignment
  • Operator-friendly apps to standardize work and reduce scrap
  • Low-disruption rollouts and flexible pricing
• Demographics:
  • 25–250 employees; single or few sites; tight margins
  • Regions aligned to OEM hubs in Midwest/Southeast/Texas
• Buying behaviors:
  • Seek fixed-scope, fixed-fee starter packs
  • Rely on peer recommendations and local manufacturing networks
  • Value hybrid delivery to limit travel and downtime

Targeting

Introduction: Targeting prioritizes the segments with the strongest mix of urgency, budget fit, and measurable outcomes, enabling disciplined allocation of marketing and delivery capacity.

Priority segments: Segment 1 (Discrete Manufacturing SMEs) and Segment 2 (Process Manufacturing SMEs)

Segment 1 priority and approach

• Why priority:
  • Large installed base and high fragmentation; strong need for OEE, changeover, and traceability gains; clear ROI from secure integrations.
• Strategy:
  • Account-based marketing to 200 named plants in Midwest/Southeast with role-specific messaging (COO/OT/Quality).
  • Partnerships with ERP/MES vendors and regional SIs to co-sell integration-led pilots.
  • Fixed-scope “Changeover Optimization Pack” (10–12 weeks) with measurable KPI guarantees (e.g., cycle-time reduction targets).

Segment 2 priority and approach

• Why priority:
  • Compliance pressures and batch complexity make UX and secure-by-design integrations a buying criterion; higher average deal sizes and strong reference value.
• Strategy:
  • Launch “Quality & Traceability Pack” (12 weeks) integrating ERP/LIMS/SCADA with audit-ready dashboards.
  • Thought leadership on security-by-design and validation (webinars, briefs) plus a complimentary “Secure Integration Readiness Assessment.”
  • Targeted industry events and regional MEP collaborations to source validated pilot opportunities.

Positioning

Introduction: Positioning clarifies how the company wins versus substitutes by foregrounding design-led adoption, secure integrations, and measurable operational outcomes. It ensures buyers recognize a faster, safer path to value than large programs or one-size platforms.

Unique value proposition: Efficient, secure, and fully tailored software and mobile applications that integrate seamlessly with existing systems, accelerate operator adoption through superior UX/UI, and deliver quantifiable improvements in OEE, changeover time, scrap, and throughput.

Market stance: A boutique, design-led, secure-by-design custom software partner for U.S. SME manufacturers, shipping MVPs in 8–12 weeks and delivering 90-day, KPI-backed outcomes.

Competitive advantages

• Personalized approach:
  • End-to-end customization from process analysis to co-design workshops on the shop floor; every project anchored to plant-level KPIs with baseline and target deltas.
• Technology innovation:
  • Continuous technology monitoring; modern cloud–edge architectures; identity-first patterns; DevSecOps with OWASP/NIST controls; AI-enabled analytics for quality, downtime, and scheduling; robust ERP/MES/PLM/SCADA connectors.
• Team expertise:
  • Strong UX/UI specialization for operator adoption; proven marketing leadership (Anthony Paillette) to drive ABM, partnerships, and demand generation; delivery model tuned to SMEs for speed and clarity.
• Service flexibility:
  • Hybrid delivery (online + on-site), modular scopes, fixed-fee discovery and starter packs, time-and-materials for scale-up, and optional managed support; integration hardening as standard.

Communication examples

• Case studies quantifying results (e.g., +10 OEE points in 90 days, 20% scrap reduction, changeover time cut by 30%).
• “Secure Integration Playbook” and validation briefs demonstrating default hardening across ERP/MES/PLM/SCADA.
• Demo apps showcasing intuitive operator UX with measurable time-to-value.
• Webinars with partners on IIoT/MOM modernization and AI-on-the-line.
• Messaging line: “Design-led software operators love. Secure integrations leaders trust.”

Sales strategy

---

Sales process

1) Targeting and Qualification (Weeks 0–2)

The firm deploys an account-based motion focused on U.S. SME manufacturers (NAICS 31–33) in clusters such as MI, OH, IL, NC, SC, GA, TX, and CA. Priority personas include VP/Operations, Plant Manager, and IT/OT leads with active initiatives in OEE, scrap, downtime, changeover, and ERP/MES/PLM integration. Top-of-funnel channels: LinkedIn outreach, industry events, referrals, and partner introductions (ERP/MES VARs). Leads are captured in a CRM with lead-scoring based on signals: budget window (<6 months), integration complexity, security risk exposure, and mobile-first needs. Qualification gates: documented pain, decision group identified, data access feasibility, and MVP scope achievable in 8–12 weeks.

2) Discovery and Value Hypothesis (Weeks 2–4)

A structured discovery engages operations and IT stakeholders to map current processes, constraints, and system topology (ERP/MES/PLM/SCADA). The team quantifies baseline KPIs—OEE, first-time-right, changeover, unplanned downtime—and security posture (identity, data flows). Workshops produce a value hypothesis linking UX-first workflows and secure integrations to measurable outcomes (e.g., 10–20% cycle-time reduction, 2–5 points OEE, 15–25% scrap reduction). Deliverables include a lightweight architecture, UX wireframes, and a risk register. A timeboxed paid discovery (typically $25k–$40k) de-risks scope, confirms data availability, and sets acceptance criteria for an MVP within 8–12 weeks.

3) Solution Design and Proposal (Weeks 4–6)

The proposal combines a fixed-scope MVP (with milestones and security hardening) and a roadmap for Phase 2 (analytics, AI augmentation, multi-site rollout). Pricing is aligned to U.S. benchmarks: average project $180k–$220k, with clear assumptions on integrations, identity, and non-functional requirements. The firm includes outcome-linked holdbacks (e.g., 10–15% tied to KPI verification) where appropriate, reflecting confidence in measurable impact. Procurement support covers vendor documentation, infosec questionnaires, and data-processing addenda. Decision enablement includes TCO vs. no-code alternatives, demonstrating lower 3–5 year ownership in specialized use cases and elimination of platform lock-in.

4) MVP Build, Pilot, and Value Verification (Weeks 6–18)

A hybrid delivery model blends remote sprints with targeted plant walks. UX/UI is iterated weekly with operator feedback to ensure adoption. Integrations to ERP/MES/PLM are implemented using secure-by-design patterns (least privilege, auditability). The pilot targets 1–2 high-impact workflows (e.g., changeover, quality checks, production tracking) with explicit success criteria: time-to-first-value <4 weeks, 80%+ operator adoption in 30 days, and quantifiable KPI deltas. Go-live includes training, runbooks, and rollback plans. Post-pilot, a value verification report quantifies financial impact (e.g., capacity lift, scrap savings) to support scale-up and executive sponsorship.

5) Contracting, Scale-Up, and Expansion (Weeks 18+)

Following a successful pilot, contracting shifts to a master services agreement with site-specific SOWs. The scale-up plan sequences additional lines and plants, adds analytics/AI features, and standardizes governance. The firm offers managed services for support and enhancements (monthly or quarterly retainers), plus a cadence of quarterly value reviews. Expansion goals: 2–3 use cases per plant in Year 1, multi-plant rollouts in Year 2, and 25–35 completed projects annually by Year 4–5, yielding $5–6M annualized revenue (~0.09–0.11% of SAM). CRM tracking covers expansion opportunities, customer health scores, NPS, and executive stakeholder mapping.

Product strategy

The offering combines bespoke software and secure integrations with an operator-first UX/UI approach. Core features: mobile-first frontline apps, composable microservices, ERP/MES/PLM connectors, identity and access controls, and cloud-edge data pipelines. Differentiation lies in rapid, design-led MVPs that reach adoption targets quickly and in security hardening as a default, not an add-on. Positioning emphasizes measurable operational outcomes for SME manufacturers—OEE, scrap, changeover, and downtime—without platform lock-in. Commercialization focuses on 2–3 high-value use cases per plant, with reusable accelerators. Pricing is transparent and milestone-based, aligned to U.S. benchmarks, with outcome-linked components to de-risk ROI.

Pricing strategy

A standard engagement blends:

• Paid discovery ($25k–$40k) to validate data, integrations, and UX hypotheses.
• MVP implementation $120k–$200k when integrations and security are in-scope; total projects average $180k–$220k.
• Enhancements and support via monthly retainers ($15k–$30k) or quarterly blocks ($45k–$90k), tiered by SLA.

Contracts use fixed price for well-defined MVPs and time-and-materials for uncertain or R&D-heavy components (e.g., novel machine protocols). Outcome-linked holdbacks (10–15%) align incentives to KPI attainment (e.g., verified cycle-time reduction). Multi-site discounts (5–10%) and template reuse reduce TCO in scale-up phases. Compared with large consultancies, the structure lowers overhead by 15–30% and compresses time-to-value. Versus no-code platforms, the model avoids compounding subscription costs and lock-in, often delivering superior 3–5 year TCO for specialized workflows. Payment terms: 20–30% mobilization, milestone-based billing, net-30. Price reviews occur post-pilot to align scope, risk, and expected value, ensuring margins while protecting client ROI.

Distribution strategy

Go-to-market relies on a hybrid direct model supported by selective partnerships. Direct channels include outbound ABM to priority states (MI, OH, IL, NC, SC, GA, TX, CA), inbound content and SEO around “secure MES/ERP integrations,” “manufacturing mobile apps,” and referrals from satisfied clients. Partnerships target ERP/MES/PLM VARs, mid-market system integrators, and cloud marketplaces (AWS/Azure) for connector listings and co-selling. Industry presence is maintained via associations and regional trade shows to access dense SME clusters. Delivery is primarily remote, with on-site plant walks for discovery, go-live, and critical changeovers—optimizing cost and lead times. Capacity is managed via a centralized delivery calendar and skill matrix to balance concurrent projects and protect MVP lead times (8–12 weeks). There is no physical inventory; “logistics” focuses on environment provisioning, access control, and compliance artifacts. Knowledge transfer includes documentation, training, and runbooks to ensure sustainability. CRM pipeline health (3–4x coverage), stage conversion, and on-time delivery SLAs underpin predictable revenue and client satisfaction.

Advertising strategy

1) Account-Based Marketing to 500 Target Plants

Run a 1:1 and 1:few ABM program aimed at VP/Operations, Plant Managers, and IT/OT leads. Tactics: LinkedIn Sponsored Content and InMail, tailored landing pages per use case (changeover, quality, production tracking), and direct mail for top 50 accounts with benchmark scorecards. Messaging highlights design-led adoption, secure integrations, and measurable outcomes within 8–12 weeks. Goals: 30–40 SQLs per quarter, 25% opportunity conversion, CAC payback <9 months. Measurement: account engagement, meeting rates, opportunity rate, and pipeline generated per persona and state cluster.

2) Proof-of-Value Content and Webinars

Publish operator-centric UX demos, security-by-design blueprints, and ROI calculators (e.g., scrap savings, OEE lift). Host monthly webinars with plant-floor case walk-throughs and live Q&A on integrating ERP/MES/PLM securely. Collaborate with partners (ERP/MES VARs) to co-host vertical sessions (food & beverage, industrial equipment). Objectives: build trust and accelerate consensus across operations and IT. KPIs: 300+ registrants/quarter, 20% live attendance, 15% demo request rate, and a 10% rise in SQL-to-opportunity conversion due to higher technical confidence.

3) Field Events and Plant Walk “Sprints”

Coordinate regional micro-events near manufacturing clusters—half-day workshops culminating in on-site plant walks for qualified prospects. Show live prototypes and mobile workflows; offer complimentary “integration readiness” assessments. Messaging underscores faster time-to-value versus large consultancies and lower TCO than no-code lock-in for specialized logic. Targets: 2–3 workshops per quarter, 25+ qualified attendees per event, 8–10 plant walks scheduled, and 4–6 MVP proposals within 30 days. Success is tracked via proposal volume, win rate, and time from event to signed SOW.

4) Partner Co-Marketing and Marketplace Presence

Launch co-branded solution briefs with ERP/MES/PLM partners and list connectors on AWS/Azure marketplaces to capture intent traffic. Campaigns emphasize secure identity, auditability, and seamless data flows across shop-floor and enterprise systems. Execute joint webinars, newsletter placements, and case-study swaps. Objectives: 20% of pipeline sourced or influenced by partners within 12 months, reduced sales cycles for integration-heavy deals, and higher technical win rates. Measure: sourced opportunities, influenced revenue, connector page views, and marketplace-driven inquiries to refine partner investments and content priorities.

Operations

---

Key Activities

• Discovery and UX-led solution design for manufacturing use cases: This activity captures business objectives, current-state processes, data flows, and plant constraints through remote interviews and targeted on-site walks. It produces measurable problem statements tied to OEE, throughput, scrap, downtime, and changeover KPIs. The team runs design sprints to prototype operator-centric interfaces, validates with frontline teams, and defines acceptance criteria, security requirements, and integration contracts for ERP/MES/PLM/SCADA. Deliverables include a clickable prototype, a prioritized backlog, a risk and security register, and a release plan with MVP scope, budget, and timeline.

  Resources required: product manager, UX/UI designer, solution architect, security engineer, and manufacturing SME.

  Typical cadence: two to three weeks, with stakeholder sign-off and traceable requirements baseline.

• Secure-by-design systems integration and cloud-edge implementation: Engineers implement APIs, connectors, and data pipelines linking shop-floor equipment, historians, and sensors with ERP, MES/MOM, PLM, and analytics platforms. Identity, access, and least-privilege patterns are established using role mapping and segregation of duties. Threat modeling, dependency scanning, SBOM generation, and secure secrets management are embedded in CI/CD. Edge gateways are configured for resilient offline operation, buffering, and compression, while cloud resources enable scalable storage and AI/analytics. Performance targets are defined for latency, message loss, and data freshness.

  Resources: solution architect, integration engineer, DevSecOps, and QA.

  Partners include device OEMs and major cloud providers. Typical outcomes: faster cycle times, auditability, and lower breach exposure. Deployment windows align with shutdowns.

• Custom mobile application engineering and rollout with change management: Cross-functional squads build high-performance mobile apps that digitize inspections, work instructions, maintenance, and production support. UX/UI is optimized for operator ergonomics, varying lighting, gloves, and language preferences. Apps integrate securely with back-end systems and device capabilities (camera, barcode, NFC) to reduce input friction. Canary and phased releases minimize risk while capturing feedback. On-site pilots validate adoption and cycle-time impact before scaled deployment. Tailored training materials, microlearning videos, and role-based onboarding accelerate time-to-value.

  Resources: product owner, mobile engineers, UX/UI designer, QA, and security.

  Delivery model is hybrid—remote sprints plus targeted plant visits—controlling budgets and ensuring fit with real-world constraints and safety protocols. Post-launch telemetry guides iterative improvements.

• Specialist talent acquisition, enablement, and delivery capacity planning: Given dependence on highly qualified engineers, the operating model prioritizes disciplined hiring, retention, and upskilling. Role profiles emphasize manufacturing domain fluency, secure integration experience, and UX empathy. A structured interview loop evaluates problem-solving, coding, security, and stakeholder communication. Mentorship, playbooks, and reusable accelerators shorten ramp time. Utilization targets and skills matrices drive resourcing across discovery, build, and rollout. Bench capacity is kept lean while maintaining surge options via vetted contractors and partner studios. Continuous technology monitoring informs training roadmaps and R&D spikes.

  Resources: talent lead, engineering managers, practice heads, and marketing for employer branding.

  Outcome: reliable delivery velocity and quality. Reduced attrition stabilizes client relationships and forecasts.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

• Time-to-MVP (days): Definition: calendar days from signed scope to first production release meeting MVP acceptance criteria, including security gates and operator sign-off. Importance: shorter Time-to-MVP accelerates learning cycles, de-risks integrations earlier, and frees budget for iterative improvement; target 8–12 weeks for SME use cases. Data collection: project tracker timestamps for contract signature, sprint zero completion, security approvals, pilot start, MVP go-live. Reporting cadence: weekly burn-up and cumulative flow diagrams to surface blockers. Segment by use case type (quality, maintenance, production tracking) and delivery mode (remote vs. hybrid) to benchmark. Objective: sustain Time-to-MVP under 70 days while preserving quality and security.

• Operator Adoption and Active Usage: Definition: percentage of targeted frontline users logging in weekly and completing defined workflows, plus session length and task completion rates within apps. Importance: high adoption correlates with sustained productivity gains and lower reversion to paper; target ≥75% weekly active users and ≥90% task completion. Data collection: in-app telemetry, identity logs, and dashboard analytics aggregated per plant, shift, and role. Complement with short pulse surveys on usability and training adequacy. Reporting cadence: biweekly during rollout, then monthly. Segment by module and device type. Objective: sustain ≥70% weekly active usage three months post go-live and systematically improve.

• Manufacturing Impact (OEE/Throughput/Scrap): Definition: measured change in OEE, line throughput, first-time-right, scrap, downtime, and changeover time attributable to delivered solutions, normalized per asset or line. Importance: quantifies business value; target double-digit improvements within 12–24 weeks for prioritized use cases. Data collection: integrations to MES/MOM, historians, and quality systems; baseline captured during discovery, compared to post-deployment rolling averages. Attribution approach: difference-in-differences on comparable lines or shifts. Reporting cadence: monthly with management summaries. Segment by plant and use case. Objective: deliver ≥10% OEE uplift or equivalent savings per deployment within targeted timeframe. Include confidence intervals and highlight data quality gaps for decisions.

• Security Posture and Integration Quality: Definition: vulnerability density per KLOC, mean time to remediate (MTTR) critical findings, percentage of integrations passing penetration tests, and incidents per quarter. Importance: the U.S. faces the highest breach costs; reducing exposure protects clients and brand. Data collection: CI/CD scanners, SBOMs, SAST/DAST reports, infrastructure benchmarks, and incident tickets mapped to releases. Reporting cadence: weekly for remediation, quarterly for posture trends. Targets: MTTR critical <7 days; 100% secrets scanning; zero high findings at go-live. Objective: sustain declining defect trends while maintaining performance. Include supplier risk reviews and identity audits across environments quarterly to validate least-privilege controls.

• Delivery Reliability and Project Margin: Definition: on-time delivery rate against committed milestones, budget variance at completion, and gross margin per project after direct delivery costs. Importance: predictable delivery and healthy margins sustain reinvestment in R&D and talent, enabling scale without quality erosion. Data collection: PMO schedules, earned value metrics, timekeeping, and cost-of-delivery dashboards. Reporting cadence: weekly for schedule risk, monthly for financials. Targets: ≥95% milestones met, budget variance within ±5%, and project gross margin ≥35%. Objective: systematically improve forecast accuracy and backlog throughput while maintaining client satisfaction. Segment results by use case, team composition, and delivery mode for insights continuously.

Quality Controls

• Design Assurance and Usability Testing: Every prototype undergoes heuristic review and task-based testing with representative operators across shifts. Measures include task time, error rate, satisfaction, and accessibility checks under plant conditions (gloves, noise, lighting). Findings convert to explicit acceptance criteria. A design freeze requires ≥90% task completion without assistance and documented mitigations for edge cases before development proceeds.

• Secure Development Lifecycle Gates: Each merge requires peer review against secure coding checklists, automated SAST/DAST, dependency scanning, and SBOM generation. Secrets detection is mandatory; builds fail on high-severity findings. Pre-release penetration testing validates integrations and role-based access. Go-live requires zero high vulnerabilities and MTTR plans for medium issues. Evidence is archived for audit and client sign-off.

• Integration and Performance Validation: Test harnesses simulate equipment events and ERP/MES/PLM transactions to validate message ordering, idempotency, and data accuracy. SLAs for latency, throughput, and freshness are load-tested at peak volumes. Offline/edge scenarios are exercised for queue durability and recovery. Sign-off requires sustained SLA conformance for two hours and zero data loss under failover conditions.

• Rollout Governance and Hypercare: A gated rollout plan defines pilot scope, success thresholds, rollback criteria, and communication templates. During the first two weeks post go-live, a cross-functional hypercare team monitors telemetry, issues, and user feedback, executing rapid patches when needed. Exit criteria include stabilization of error rates, ≥70% weekly active users, and closure of critical tickets.

Implementation Plan

• Foundational setup and talent build: finalize legal, insurance, security policies, and delivery playbooks; recruit core team (product, UX, engineering, DevSecOps). Establish vendor relationships and partner roster for surge capacity. Stand up toolchain (code, CI/CD, monitoring) and sales assets.

  Timeline: 0–90 days. Resources: founders, marketing, practice leads, and vendor management office.

• Pipeline generation and discovery sprinting: launch targeted outreach to SME manufacturers in priority states; publish case-style thought leadership on UX, security, and OEE outcomes. Run two to three concurrent discovery sprints converting to MVP scopes.

  Timeline: days 30–120. Resources: marketing director, sales, product, UX, architect, security engineer per engagement average.

• First-wave builds and deployments: execute MVPs with hybrid delivery, secure integrations, and rigorous QA; pilot on-site, iterate, and scale. Measure adoption and manufacturing impact against baselines. Document reusable accelerators and playbooks.

  Timeline: days 90–240. Resources: cross-functional squads, DevSecOps, QA, client champions, and partner contractors for surge capacity as needed seasonally.

• Scale, optimize, and expand: refine forecasting, utilization, and margin; deepen partnerships with device OEMs and platforms; formalize governance across security, quality, and delivery. Launch reference programs and client councils. Enter adjacent use cases and states.

  Timeline: days 180–540. Resources: PMO, practice heads, marketing, finance, and talent acquisition to support growth.

Technology Strategy

---

Technology Selection

1) Composable cloud–edge IIoT and data platform

AxioSoft will implement an OPC UA/MQTT-based edge layer connected to Azure IoT Hub or AWS IoT Core, orchestrated with Kubernetes. Time-series storage (TimescaleDB/InfluxDB), event streaming (Kafka), and a semantic API layer integrate securely with ERP/MES/PLM. Advantages: robust connectivity, low-latency shop-floor insights, and scalable analytics/AI for OEE, downtime, and scrap. Disadvantages: higher initial complexity and skill demands. Integration: standardized connectors, data contracts, and reusable adapters enable 12-week MVPs, then incremental expansion across production lines and plants.

2) Design-led cross-platform application stack

To maximize adoption, AxioSoft will use React/TypeScript for web, React Native or Flutter for mobile, underpinned by a Figma-powered design system and DesignOps practices. Advantages: consistent UX/UI, rapid prototyping, offline-first capability for frontline operators, and reduced training time. Disadvantages: device fragmentation and native feature gaps may require selective native modules. Integration: a shared component library, telemetry-instrumented UI, and micro-frontends align with secure APIs, enabling iterative releases and measurable UX outcomes (task time, error rate, first-time-right) across operator, maintenance, and quality apps.

3) Secure-by-design identity, integration, and DevSecOps

Security is embedded via Zero Trust patterns, OIDC/SAML SSO (Azure AD/Okta), RBAC/ABAC authorization, secrets management (Vault), and end-to-end encryption (TLS 1.3/AES-256). Advantages: hardened integrations and materially lower breach exposure in the highest-cost market. Disadvantages: added governance overhead and early-stage velocity trade-offs. Integration: Terraform/IaC, CI/CD (GitHub Actions) with SAST/DAST/SBOM (e.g., Snyk), policy-as-code, and SIEM/SOAR (Microsoft Sentinel) enforce continuous compliance, with change management and audit trails aligned to SOC 2-ready controls.

Expected Technology Contribution

The selected stack is designed to accelerate measurable outcomes and revenue. The IIoT/data platform shortens time-to-value with production-ready connectors and analytics—supporting 5–15 OEE point improvements, 10–20% scrap reduction, and 20–40% changeover-time cuts in targeted use cases. The design-led app stack increases operator adoption, reducing onboarding and error rates, which directly raises throughput and first-time-right. Secure-by-design integration reduces incident probability and impact in a market where average U.S. breach costs approximate $9.36M, safeguarding client operations and reputation. Together, these technologies enable AxioSoft to ship 12-week MVPs, standardize reusable assets, and scale delivery to 25–35 projects annually by years 3–5. This supports the revenue objective of ~$5–6M annualized SOM while reinforcing a defensible position in SME manufacturing digitalization.

Technology Requirements

• Architecture and platforms
  • Cloud: Azure or AWS (IoT Core/IoT Hub, managed Kubernetes, managed Postgres/TimescaleDB, object storage, key management).
  • Edge: Industrial gateways supporting OPC UA/MQTT; container runtime; secure device onboarding.
  • Data/analytics: Kafka, dbt, BI (Power BI/Looker), feature store for lightweight ML.
• Tooling and security
  • CI/CD (GitHub Actions), IaC (Terraform), SAST/DAST/SCA, SBOM, secrets management (Vault), SIEM/SOAR (Sentinel).
  • Identity: Azure AD/Okta, OIDC/SAML, RBAC/ABAC, device/MDM for mobile fleet.
• Talent and delivery
  • Core team Y1: 8–12 FTE (2 full-stack, 2 mobile, 1 data/IoT, 1 cloud/security, 2 UX/UI, 1 PM). Scale to 18–25 FTE by Y3.
  • Partnerships: Cloud (Azure/AWS), device OEMs, industrial connectivity vendors.
• Service levels and compliance
  • SLOs: 99.5–99.9% availability for critical services; P95 UI latency <1s; incident MTTR <4h for Sev-1.
  • Governance: SOC 2-ready controls; audit logging, backup/DR (RPO ≤15 min, RTO ≤2h).
• Budget guidance
  • Tooling/security/compliance: 5–7% of revenue; platform and environments: $150k–$250k/year baseline; per-client cloud ops: $1–3k/month depending on data volume.

Technology Implementation

• Phase 0: Foundations (0–90 days)
  • Stand up cloud landing zone, IAM, CI/CD, IaC, logging/SIEM, and base Kubernetes cluster; publish design system v1; build reference OPC UA/MQTT connector. Resources: core team + cloud/security architect.
• Phase 1: Pilot MVPs (Weeks 4–16)
  • Deliver 1–2 use-case MVPs (e.g., changeover tracking, quality checks) with secure ERP/MES integration. Resources: 1 squad (PM, UX, 2–3 engineers, data/IoT). KPI baselines established.
• Phase 2: Scale-up and hardening (Months 4–9)
  • Reusable connectors, micro-frontends, and analytics templates; SOC 2 readiness; performance tuning. Resources: add QA/automation, DevSecOps.
• Phase 3: Multi-plant rollout (Months 9–18)
  • Release trains, MDM rollout, DR drills, and support playbooks. Resources: 2–3 squads; customer enablement.
• Ongoing: Optimization (Quarterly)
  • AI features (anomaly detection, scheduling), A/B UX improvements, cost optimization.

Technology Management

• Product and architecture governance: quarterly architecture reviews, ADRs, and a standards catalog (APIs, schemas, security baselines).
• Secure SDLC: threat modeling, mandatory code reviews, SAST/DAST/SCA, SBOMs, and signed artifacts; change control with canary releases.
• Reliability and incident management: SRE practices, on-call rotations, error budgets, post-incident reviews, and capacity management.
• Data governance: data classification, lineage, retention, and access audits; privacy-by-design for operator data.
• Vendor and asset management: SLA tracking, license audits, device lifecycle/MDM, and cost monitoring with FinOps.
• KPI management: delivery lead time, deployment frequency, MTTR, P95 latency, adoption (DAU/MAU), and ROI KPIs (OEE, scrap, downtime).

Digital Strategy

Step 1: Design-led adoption engine

The first priority is to institutionalize a design system and UX metrics that translate directly into operator adoption and productivity. A Figma-based system, reusable components, and a UX research cadence will compress discovery cycles and reduce cognitive load on the shop floor. Each release will be instrumented to track completion time, error rate, and first-time-right. Quarterly design sprints target measurable improvements (e.g., 15% faster task completion).

Resources: DesignOps lead, 2 UX/UI designers, analytics specialist, and a library governance workflow to scale across projects.

Step 2: Secure integration by default

Security becomes a visible product feature and a procurement differentiator. All integrations adopt Zero Trust, OIDC/SAML SSO, RBAC/ABAC, and encrypted data flows. DevSecOps pipelines produce SBOMs and compliance evidence, enabling faster vendor risk reviews and fewer deployment blockers. The goal is to reduce critical vulnerability dwell time to under seven days and maintain sub-4-hour MTTR for Sev-1 incidents.

Resources: security architect, platform engineer, budget for SIEM/SOAR, SAST/DAST/SCA tools, and periodic third-party penetration testing.

Step 3: ROI-focused use-case sequencing

The go-to-market targets two to three high-value use cases per plant—changeover optimization, inline quality, and production tracking—sequenced for 12-week MVPs followed by 6–12 week expansions. Each engagement starts with a quantified baseline and targets specific outcomes: +5–15 OEE points, −10–20% scrap, and −20–40% changeover time. This focus concentrates engineering capacity on repeatable wins, yielding case studies that drive pipeline conversion.

Resources: one cross-functional squad per client, KPI analyst, and a playbook of connectors and dashboards.

Step 4: Data and AI activation

Instrumentation-by-default feeds a governed data layer (Kafka, TimescaleDB, dbt) to enable descriptive, diagnostic, and selective predictive capabilities. Lightweight models address anomaly detection, asset health, and schedule recommendations, with human-in-the-loop controls. Success is measured by decision latency reductions and forecast accuracy improvements. Target: cut unplanned downtime by 10% within six months of deployment.

Resources: data engineer, ML engineer (shared), MLOps tooling, and defined model risk management practices to keep solutions explainable, supportable, and secure.

Step 5: Hybrid delivery at scale

A hybrid model blends online discovery/prototyping with on-site plant walks and go-lives, maintaining velocity without sacrificing context. Standardized release trains, remote observability, and MDM enable multi-site rollouts with consistent SLOs. The delivery objective is to sustain 4–6 concurrent engagements with 2–3 squads, preserving lead times under four weeks for new client starts.

Resources: delivery manager, solution architects, field deployment engineers, customer enablement kits, and partner channels with Azure/AWS and industrial OEMs to accelerate integrations and co-selling.

Management structure

---

Ownership resides with the founding partners, who hold majority equity and set strategic direction, capital allocation, and governance.

Day-to-day leadership is organized around a core team at pre‑launch:

• a CEO (founder) overseeing client value
• a Head of Engineering accountable for delivery quality and secure integrations
• and a UX/UI Lead responsible for design systems and operator adoption

• The Marketing Director, Anthony Paillette, drives market positioning, demand generation, and marketing.
• A Delivery Manager (PM/Scrum Master) coordinates scope and budget across online and onsite engagements.
• Core employees include full‑stack and mobile engineers, QA, DevOps/SRE, and an Integration Architect focused on ERP/MES/PLM interoperability.
• A Security & Compliance specialist hardens identity and data flows.
• Client Success ensures post‑go‑live adoption and KPI realization.
• Finance and People Operations provide controls in ramp‑up.

Responsibilities are outcome‑linked:

• engineering to OEE and cycle‑time improvements
• design to adoption and training time reduction
• marketing to qualified pipeline
• delivery to on‑time, on‑budget releases

Decision-making process

• Strategic decisions (vision, market entry, multi‑quarter investments, partnerships) are approved by the founding partners in a monthly governance forum, with documented charters and ROI thresholds.
• Operational decisions are delegated to a cross‑functional triad—the Head of Engineering, UX/UI Lead, and Marketing Director—guided by OKRs tied to adoption, security, and productivity outcomes.
• Budget thresholds ensure speed with control: work under $25k or within approved statements of work is greenlit by the Delivery Manager; higher commitments escalate to founders.
• Product decisions follow a discovery→prototype→MVP gate, informed by client KPIs (OEE, scrap, changeover time) and security risk assessments.
• Communication flows through weekly sprint reviews, a shared roadmap in Confluence, and a monthly all‑hands.
• Given a sub‑10 core team at launch, decisions emphasize short feedback loops, written rationale, and clear RACI ownership to reduce cycle time and rework.

Human resources management

• Head of Engineering/Delivery — Owns delivery P&L, quality, architecture, and secure integrations. Requirements: 8+ years, shipped B2B systems, ERP/MES experience, AWS/Azure, Agile/Scrum.
• UX/UI Lead — Defines design system, research, and usability; drives adoption and training efficiency. Requirements: 6+ years, portfolio in industrial apps, Figma, accessibility.
• Senior Full-Stack Engineer — Builds web back/front-end, APIs, tests. Requirements: 5+ years, TypeScript/Node/.NET/Java, CI/CD, OWASP, unit/integration testing.
• Mobile Engineer — Delivers iOS/Android apps, offline-first, secure storage. Requirements: 4+ years, Kotlin/Swift/Flutter/React Native, mobile CI, store guidelines.
• Integration Architect — Designs ERP/MES/PLM connectors, data models, and event pipelines. Requirements: 7+ years, manufacturing data standards, ETL, APIs, security.
• Security & Compliance Specialist — Identity, secrets, SAST/DAST, SOC 2 program. Requirements: 5+ years, CISSP/CCSP preferred, threat modeling.
• QA Automation Engineer — Test strategy, frameworks, performance, and UAT. Requirements: 4+ years, Cypress/Playwright/Appium, API testing.
• Delivery Manager (PM/Scrum Master) — Scope, schedule, budget, stakeholder communication. Requirements: 5+ years, CSM/PMP, Jira, metrics/OKRs.

Recruitment

Recruitment will blend targeted outreach and community presence.

Channels:

• LinkedIn Recruiter
• Wellfound
• GitHub
• niche Slack communities
• university partnerships
• referrals from vetted contractors

Selection criteria prioritize manufacturing use‑case fluency, secure integration experience (ERP/MES/PLM), strong UX sensibility, code quality, and communication.

Certifications (AWS/Azure, CISSP), portfolios, and quantified outcomes (e.g., OEE gains, defect rates) are required evidence.

Process:

1. résumé screen within 72 hours
2. structured interview
3. technical assessment or portfolio walkthrough
4. values interview with the Marketing Director and Delivery Lead
5. references
6. optional paid trial sprint

• Time‑to‑offer target is ≤21 days
• Acceptance rate ≥70%
• Diversity slate requirement ensures balanced pipelines across all roles consistently

Employee training and development

Capability building centers on secure, design‑led delivery for manufacturing.

Core programs:

• product onboarding (tools, design system, coding standards)
• secure‑by‑design training (OWASP, threat modeling, identity)
• manufacturing systems primers (ERP/MES/PLM/SCADA)
• cloud certifications (AWS/Azure)

UX/UI training covers heuristics, accessibility (WCAG 2.1), and rapid prototyping.

Engineers pursue applied AI modules for quality, predictive maintenance, and scheduling.

Development methods include mentorship pairings, quarterly skill plans, 10% learning time, and conference budgets tied to project needs.

Effectiveness is measured via:

• certification pass rates (≥85%)
• cycle‑time reduction to MVP (−20% within 6 months)
• post‑release defect density (≤0.3/kloc)
• security findings resolved within SLA (≥95%)
• user‑adoption metrics (task completion time and adoption rate improvements of ≥15%)

Results are reviewed in quarterly talent councils and inform promotions and individualized growth roadmaps annually.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) policy

The company anchors its CSR policy on security, inclusion, community impact, and environmental stewardship aligned to its manufacturing focus.

Commitments include:

• privacy‑by‑design
• responsible AI (human oversight, dataset governance)
• accessibility by default in all client deliverables

Environmental goals prioritize low‑carbon operations:

• cloud efficiency reviews
• serverless where feasible
• Green‑Power data centers
• hybrid work to minimize travel
• e‑waste recycling with certified vendors

Targets:

• achieve SOC 2 Type II by Year 2
• 100% projects undergo SAST/DAST
• reduce nonessential travel miles per FTE by 40% by Year 3
• procure 100% renewable‑matched cloud by Year 3

Social commitments include:

• paid volunteering (one day per quarter)
• 1% of delivery hours to pro‑bono or discounted builds for workforce development or sustainability nonprofits
• STEM mentorships with regional universities

Inclusion goals: structured interview rubrics, salary transparency, and a diverse slate policy; aim for 40% underrepresented talent in hiring pipelines and 35% in technical roles by Year 3.

Annual CSR reporting discloses progress, corrective actions, and supplier adherence to the code of conduct.

Supplier standards require security baselines, fair labor practices, and environmental compliance; 100% of vendors must sign the code and complete annual attestations.

It supports manufacturers via cybersecurity workshops and accessibility audits to raise digital resilience.

Growth Strategy

---

Market Development

In the next 12 months, the company will concentrate on U.S. SME manufacturers in the Midwest/Great Lakes, Southeast, Texas, and California, targeting NAICS 31–33 plants with 50–999 employees. Objectives: secure 8–10 pilot projects focused on changeover, quality, and production tracking, and reach $1.5M–$2.0M annualized run‑rate by month 12. Go‑to‑market combines ABM campaigns, factory‑floor webinars on secure integrations, and on‑site diagnostics, supported by case-style proof of value within 8–12 weeks. Mid‑term (months 13–36), expansion will add adjacent clusters via partner referrals, scaling to 25–35 projects/year and $4.5M–$6.0M revenue by Year 3–4 with 60% pilot‑to‑rollout conversion. Long‑term (36+ months), growth will deepen share in discrete and process manufacturing, replicate wins across multi‑plant networks, and open a selective enterprise tier without abandoning SME fit. Pricing remains outcome‑linked and transparent, underpinned by a hybrid delivery model to shorten timelines and lower total cost overall.

Product Development

Short term (0–12 months), the roadmap prioritizes a reusable UX/UI design system, secure connector kits for ERP/MES/PLM/SCADA, and a DevSecOps toolchain (SAST/DAST, IaC) to cut time‑to‑MVP below eight weeks. Prebuilt modules for changeover timing, digital quality checks, and production tracking will deliver 30–40% code reuse and standardized telemetry for OEE, downtime, and scrap. Mid term (12–24 months), releases will add mobile‑first operator apps with offline modes, role‑based identity, and audit trails, plus analytics packs and applied‑AI features (vision‑assisted inspection, anomaly detection, and scheduling heuristics). Targets: 80%+ operator adoption within 30 days and 20–30% faster cycle times in pilot lines. Long term (24–48 months), the strategy productizes proven components into optional subscriptions—managed integrations, security hardening, and monitoring SLAs (99.9% availability)—while keeping bespoke builds core. Continuous technology monitoring will refresh frameworks, edge/cloud patterns, and encryption baselines annually to maintain performance, security, and interoperability across client environments, and lifecycle documentation standards.

Partnerships

Priority alliances will focus on cloud and manufacturing ecosystems that accelerate delivery and reduce client risk. Short term, the goal is to secure 3–5 technology partnerships (AWS/Azure, Snowflake, Microsoft Power Platform), plus connectors with leading plant systems (Rockwell, Siemens, PTC, and SAP/Oracle ERPs). Memberships in regional MEP centers and industry groups (SME, NAM, MESA) will amplify credibility and yield plant‑floor introductions. Mid term, 2–3 commercial partnerships with IIoT gateway vendors and cybersecurity providers (e.g., Claroty/Nozomi, Okta/Azure AD) will enable co‑selling and packaged “secure integration” offers. Long term, a curated partner network will contribute 25–30% of qualified pipeline, cut integration effort by 20% via certified adapters, and open multi‑site rollouts through OEM channels while preserving a vendor‑agnostic advisory stance. positioning.

Risks and Mitigation

---

1) Talent Scarcity and Delivery Capacity

Risk: Delivery depends on highly qualified engineers and designers at a time of intense tech labor competition. Scarcity risks project delays, rising costs, and variable quality—particularly for complex ERP/MES/PLM integrations and secure, high-performance UX/UI builds. With median U.S. custom-dev projects around $132k and rates of $100–$149/hour, prolonged vacancies or overutilization can erode margins and client satisfaction in a fragmented, fast-growing market.

Mitigation: Implement a blended model: a core senior team plus a vetted nearshore bench providing 20–30% elastic capacity. Set hiring SLAs (time-to-fill <45 days; offer-acceptance >70%), target utilization at 70–80%, and voluntary attrition <10%. Establish a skills matrix, design system, and reusable integration accelerators to compress delivery by 15–25%. Tie quarterly incentives to on-time delivery (>95%).

2) Security and Systems-Integration Risk

Risk: Secure-by-design integrations across ERP/MES/PLM/SCADA and mobile apps expand the attack surface; a U.S. data breach averages ~$9.36M, making any lapse financially material. Hybrid (online/on-site) delivery and edge-cloud architectures add identity, access, and data-flow complexity. Failure to harden interfaces or maintain patch discipline can cause disruptions, penalties, and reputational damage for both provider and client.

Mitigation: Apply threat modeling on every engagement; adopt zero-trust patterns, MFA/SSO, least privilege, encryption in transit/at rest, and auditable data minimization. Institutionalize SAST/DAST, SBOM for all releases, and third-party pen tests pre–go-live. Define patch SLAs (critical <72 hours), 24-hour incident triage, and 72-hour client notification. Pursue SOC 2 Type II within 12–18 months and maintain $5M cyber coverage. Track security KPIs: vulnerability closure rate >95% monthly.

3) Build-vs-Buy Displacement and Price Pressure

Risk: No-code/composable platforms (e.g., Tulip) show rapid time-to-value and modeled ROIs above 400% in TEI studies, while large consultancies demonstrate multi-metric plant gains. SMEs may prefer productized speed or big-brand assurance. Combined with transparent U.S. pricing benchmarks, this creates substitution and margin pressure for bespoke builds, extending sales cycles and compressing scope.

Mitigation: Operate platform-agnostic. Offer a 2-week ROI/TCO decision framework comparing custom vs. platform vs. hybrid. Commit to MVPs in ≤12 weeks with measurable outcomes (e.g., +5–15% OEE, −20–40% changeover in 90 days) and phased, fixed-fee milestones. Maintain a connector library to ERP/MES/PLM and position as integrator/coexist partner when platforms fit. Use performance-linked fees (10–20% at-risk) to de-risk buyer decisions while protecting target gross margin >40%.

About

---

Company Mission

The company exists to help U.S. manufacturers translate digital ambition into measurable operational gains.

Small and mid-sized manufacturers face three persistent barriers to transformation:

• Fragmented systems and manual workflows that cap OEE and throughput, with integration to ERP/MES/PLM often delaying projects and undermining data integrity.
• Adoption friction on the shop floor caused by poor UX/UI, which extends training time and slows time-to-value; design leaders have been shown to outperform peers with 32% higher revenue growth and 56% higher total shareholder returns over five years—evidence that UX excellence is a growth lever, not an accessory.
• Escalating cyber risk; the average U.S. data breach cost sits near $9.36M, making secure-by-design integrations a financial imperative for SMEs.

Mission

Deliver efficient, secure, and fully tailored technological solutions and custom software—with strong, operator-centric UX/UI—to support clients’ digital transformation, optimize processes, improve productivity, and drive measurable growth.

How the mission translates into action

• Bespoke builds, not one-size-fits-all: Custom software and mobile applications tailored to specific plant and business needs.
• UX/UI-first delivery: Intuitive, high-performance interfaces that shorten learning curves and increase sustained adoption on the shop floor.
• Secure-by-design integrations: Hardened connectors and identity patterns across ERP/MES/PLM and production systems to reduce breach exposure and downtime.
• Seamless integration: Engineering that respects existing infrastructure while unlocking real-time data flows for analytics and decision-making.
• Hybrid delivery: Online collaboration for speed and cost efficiency, paired with targeted on-site plant walks and rollouts to de-risk deployment.
• Continuous technology monitoring: Active scanning of tools and methods to keep client solutions current and resilient.

Differentiation

• End-to-end customization aligned to manufacturing KPIs (OEE, throughput, scrap, changeover time), rather than platform lock-in or oversized consulting programs.
• UX/UI as a core capability to accelerate operator adoption and ROI—validated by market evidence on design-led performance.
• Security engineered into every layer (identity, data, least-privilege access, encrypted flows), aligning investment with the real cost of breaches in the U.S. market.
• A boutique, outcome-focused model that ships value quickly—combining lean governance with enterprise-grade engineering.

Near-term, measurable objectives for clients

• Ship a production-ready MVP in 8–12 weeks per use case.
• Deliver 10–20% OEE uplift within 90–180 days in targeted lines, depending on baseline maturity.
• Reduce changeover times by 15–30% via mobile-first workflows and data-driven scheduling.
• Cut scrap/rework by 5–15% through better data capture, UX-led quality workflows, and targeted analytics.
• Achieve 99.9% application uptime with CI/CD and test automation, and align code hardening to OWASP/CIS best practices.

Company Values

• Client-centered partnership: Every engagement starts with a deep analysis of business processes and objectives to ensure fit-for-purpose solutions and accountable outcomes.
• Design excellence: Operator-first UX/UI reduces training time, increases adoption, and protects ROI across the solution lifecycle.
• Security and trust: Identity, data protection, and least-privilege patterns are defaults, not add-ons—critical in the highest-cost breach market.
• Measurable impact: Success is defined by quantifiable improvements in OEE, throughput, scrap, and time-to-value—not by artifact volume.
• Continuous innovation: Ongoing technology monitoring informs architectures, toolchains, and accelerators that keep clients competitive.
• Transparency and ownership: Clear scopes, iterative delivery, and objective KPIs ensure stakeholders see progress and value each sprint.

Team

Key collaborator

• Anthony Paillette, Marketing Director (Directeur Marketing)
  • Role: Leads go-to-market strategy for U.S. manufacturing SMEs; defines positioning around UX, security, and measurable operational impact.
  • Contribution: Builds demand-generation engines (content, ABM, events), strengthens partnerships in manufacturing clusters, and equips sales with ROI narratives tied to plant KPIs.
  • Skills: Brand and product marketing, pipeline design, partner development, analytics-driven campaign optimization, and sales enablement.

Core delivery capabilities (functional leads)

• Engineering Lead (Custom Software & Mobile)
  • Contribution: Ships reliable, scalable applications and mobile tools; sets coding standards, CI/CD, and test automation.
  • Skills: Full-stack and cloud-native engineering, edge/IIoT integration, microservices and APIs, automated QA.
• Solutions Architect (Systems Integration: ERP/MES/PLM)
  • Contribution: De-risks integrations with existing systems to enable seamless data flows and stable operations.
  • Skills: SAP/Oracle/Microsoft Dynamics/Epicor/Plex integrations; OPC UA/MQTT; data modeling; IAM patterns.
• UX/UI Lead (Operator Experience)
  • Contribution: Drives discovery, prototyping, and design systems that maximize adoption and shorten time-to-value.
  • Skills: User research, information architecture, accessibility, high-fidelity prototyping, design systems for industrial contexts.
• Cybersecurity Lead
  • Contribution: Embeds secure-by-design practices and conducts hardening to reduce breach and downtime risk.
  • Skills: Threat modeling, secure coding, vulnerability assessment, encryption and secrets management, compliance alignment.
• Data & AI Specialist
  • Contribution: Operationalizes analytics for OEE, downtime, scrap, and predictive use cases; deploys pragmatic AI on the plant floor.
  • Skills: Data engineering, MLOps, anomaly detection, computer vision for quality, explainability and monitoring.
• Delivery Manager (Agile/Change)
  • Contribution: Orchestrates discovery-to-rollout; ensures hybrid (online/on-site) cadence; manages training and change adoption.
  • Skills: Agile program leadership, stakeholder management, plant-floor enablement, KPI tracking.

Combined team strengths

• End-to-end delivery from discovery and architecture to rollout and support, optimized for U.S.-based SME manufacturers.
• Proven ability to integrate securely with existing systems while shipping high-UX solutions that operators actually use.
• A hybrid delivery model that accelerates timelines and protects budgets, with clear KPIs and continuous improvement baked in.